This post was originally published on this site.
In a recent publication accepted on September 23, 2024, by the Journal of Religion and Health, a Q1 Scopus-indexed journal of Springer nature, Inst. Ivan Efreaim A. Gozum, MA from the Institute of Religion co-authored a paper with Ms. Chastene Christopher D. Flake, MS from Angeles University Foundation, that introduced a new ethical framework that integrates Catholic Social Teaching (CST) with artificial intelligence (AI) ethics to address inequities in healthcare. The study, “Integrating Catholic Social Teaching with AI Ethics to Address Inequity in AI Healthcare,” tackles the potential ethical concerns arising from the widespread adoption of AI technologies in the healthcare sector, particularly in low-resource settings where inequities in access are prevalent.
The paper focuses on AI’s potential to improve patient outcomes and operational efficiency but emphasizes the challenges related to disparities in AI healthcare access. The authors propose that AI-driven healthcare solutions risk exacerbating existing inequalities, benefiting primarily those in urban and high-income areas while leaving marginalized communities behind. Their research suggests an equitable AI implementation framework, drawing from key principles of CST such as human dignity, the common good, and preferential options for the poor. These teachings, rooted in justice, align closely with the ethical concerns surrounding AI and healthcare.
Using the Church’s commitment to social justice as a guide, Gozum and Flake argue for systemic changes to ensure that AI healthcare technology benefits all communities, particularly the underserved. Their proposal is timely as AI revolutionizes medical fields, from early diagnosis to treatment customization. The authors emphasize that AI must complement healthcare professionals rather than replace them, and call for inclusive healthcare systems that prioritize equitable distribution of AI resources. They also draw attention to the ethical implications of AI algorithm biases, which could disproportionately affect marginalized groups.
This study represents a novel intersection of religion, ethics, and technology, urging both policymakers and healthcare professionals to consider the social impacts of AI and its role in global health equity.
For further details, readers can access the full paper via this link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10943-024-02140-2