Job elimination, driven not just by AI, also paves the way for new job opportunities.
Much is being said about whether artificial intelligence will destroy jobs. It will – but that conclusion ignores some important nuances. We are entering a broader transformation of work, driven not only by technology but also by structural inefficiencies that have developed over decades. What lies ahead is not simply job destruction, but a necessary reallocation of human labor.
Economic history shows that such shifts are neither new nor inherently negative. Over the last century, employment moved from agriculture to industry and then to services. Each of these transitions has phased out entire job categories, yet overall, they have led to greater productivity and increased prosperity.
The constant has been competition, innovation and the ability of individuals to adapt. When agriculture reduced its workforce dramatically, society did not collapse; instead, it opened up new sectors and generated fresh opportunities.
What is often described as “job destruction” is, in many cases, the removal of economically unsustainable structures.
What is different this time
Today, technological progress, particularly AI, blockchain and eventually quantum computing, will again transform the way we work. Routine administrative functions in finance, law and public administration are particularly vulnerable to these changes.
But technology is only part of the story. The more fundamental problem is the growth of unwieldy bureaucratic structures. Rising prosperity allowed governments to grow beyond their core functions, while bureaucracy and regulation multiplied, often addressing trivial or nonexistent problems.
This has created entire layers of employment focused not on productive work, but on managing complexity. In both the public and private sectors, millions are primarily engaged in navigating rules instead of creating value.
We find ourselves caught in a vicious cycle: Governments enact laws and regulations and then hire people to enforce and control them. Consequently, businesses are compelled to expand their staff to meet these excessive compliance requirements.
This burden weighs heavily on competitiveness and productivity. When the bloated state hires an individual from the private sector, it removes a productive worker from the economy. This not only affects productivity but also means taxpayers remain responsible for covering the costs associated with the lost worker.
An entirely unproductive sector has emerged, focusing on advising businesses on how to navigate increasingly complex regulations.
Europe, especially, has significantly diminished its global competitiveness due to this vicious cycle. In addition, an entirely unproductive sector has emerged, focusing on advising businesses on how to navigate increasingly complex regulations. This has become essential, as the rules are often so opaque and irrational that companies require specialists to interpret and implement them.
Contrary to common belief, the biggest disruption will not be in blue-collar jobs. Industrial and manual roles will continue to change because they are tied to tangible output. The greater impact will fall on white-collar administrative roles, where technology will increasingly automate routine tasks, and the pressure to simplify conflicting and overly complex regulations will become unavoidable. Together, these forces will eliminate large amounts of administrative work.
A fiscal reality check
There is also a financial constraint that cannot be ignored. The expansion of the public sector has reached unsustainable levels. Financing large bureaucracies and long-term liabilities tied to aging populations is becoming untenable.
This pressure will speed up the reduction of unproductive activities. The private sector, which was forced to grow in parallel to handle regulatory complexity, will then be able to adjust.
What is often described as “job destruction” is, in many cases, the removal of economically unsustainable structures.
This transformation will be disruptive. It will require flexibility from workers and responsibility from policymakers. Attempts to block change through additional regulation will only make the situation worse.
Read more by GIS Founder and Chairman Prince Michael of Liechtenstein
Yet, the potential benefits are substantial. By reducing administrative overhead and adopting new technologies, productivity can grow significantly. Human effort can be redirected toward areas that generate real value – innovation, research, entrepreneurship and human-centered services.
In fields like medicine and research, these technologies will enhance systems and boost staff capabilities. They will cut time spent on paperwork and enable more focus on meaningful work.
The broader effect is not only economic. Greater productivity can support higher living standards, better education and more effective environmental protection.
A familiar pattern – if we allow it
The current transformation follows a pattern seen before. When large segments of the workforce moved out of agriculture, new sectors began to flourish. The same will happen again if societies embrace change rather than resist it.
What we need is not fear, but a clear-eyed perspective. While technological advancements and structural reforms may lead to the loss of certain jobs, they also have the potential to create new opportunities. If we handle these shifts wisely, they can pave the way for greater prosperity.
The real risk lies not in change itself, but in attempts to prevent it.
Sign up for our newsletter
Receive insights from our experts every week in your inbox.